Home     Contact     Projects     Experiments     Circuits     Theory     BLOG     PIC Tutorials     Time for Science     RSS     Terms of services     Privacy policy  
   
 Home      Projects     Experiments     Circuits     Theory     BLOG     PIC Tutorials     Time for Science   

3 April 2010
Author: Giorgos Lazaridis
High Frequency PWM Fan Controller


The circuit on a breadboard for testing

The PWM fan controllers have many advantages against other rpm fan controllers. Yet, they tend to be difficult in construction when high frequency is required. The PWM controllers usually generate acoustic noises, when the PWM frequency is within the acoustic spectrum (20Hz to 20KHz). A high frequency PWM controller usually operates above the 20KHz, thus the human ear cannot hear this sound. Moreover, PWM controllers can achieve very stable and low speeds without the possibility of a fan stall.

The circuit that i will present to you has all the advantages of the high frequency PWM controllers, but it uses only a 555 timer to generate the pulses. Although the frequency is not very stable (come on it is just a 555 for crying out loud), it will never fall bellow 21KHz thus you will not hear a thing







The circuit

The circuit is very easy to follow. The output (pin 3) of the 555 timer will control the charging and the discharging of the capacitor. This is the only point that needs of your attention. Usually the capacitor is charged through a resistor directly connected to the power supply, and discharged through pin 7 (discharging capacitor). Now the capacitor is charged from the output of the 555 when it is HIGH, and discharge the same way when the output is LOW. The frequency is calculated from the capacitor itself ( C1 ) as well as from the total resistance of the potentiometer parallel to R3.

Here is the circuit:






The PWM pulses

The duty cycle is changed according to the position of the potentiometer. For the complete period calculation of a pulse, the total resistance of the potentiometer (in parallel to R3 of course) is calculated. But, during the charging of the capacitor, the current goes only through D1, and during discharging, the current goes only through D2. This, according to the position of the potentiometer, the charge period and the discharge period will change, but the complete period of the pulse will always be the charge period plus the discharge period! That is the whole idea of the PWM generation.

Unlike a normal 555 astable multivibrator circuit, the output is taken from pin 7. If you see the internal diagram of a 555 timer, you will see that pin 7 is connected to the discharging capacitor. But the discharging is taken over by the output of the 555, as described above. Thus this pin is free to be used. A resistor is connected to this pin and the it turns the internal transistor into a switching transistor (inverting amplifier). As a result, during the discharging time, pin 7 is logic LOW, while during the charging time pin 7 is logic HIGH. This is driven directly to the control wire of the 4-wire fan. No driving transistor is needed, as we use the internal 555 transistor for this. The rest is taken over by the fan controller itself, as the 4-wire fan carries internally the switching FET (see page "How PC Fans work").


The 4-wire fans have a very clear RPM feedback even if they are driven with PWM pulses 17 Hz (510 rpm) is the minimum rpm predefined by the manufacturer. 64 Hz (1920 rpm) is the maximum RPM





Bill Of Materials (First circuit)
Resistors
R1Resistor 1 KOhm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film 
R21 KOhm potentiometer
R3Resistor 4.7 KOhm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film 
Capacitors
C10.1 uF ceramic capacitor
C21 uF 16 Volts electrolytic capacitor
Integrated Circuits
IC1555 Timer 
Diodes
D11N4148 Switching Diode 
D21N4148 Switching Diode 



What about the 3-wire and the 2-wire fans?

A 3-wire fan connected to the circuit on a breadboard for test

No problem... almost... You see, 4-wire fans have internally a switching FET, something that 3-wire and 2-wire fans lack of (see page "How PC Fans work"). Thus, we need to add this FET externally. The circuit is the following:





You may notice that i have add another resistor to the circuit, the R4. The R4 will prevent the fan from running at very low speeds with the possibility to stall. Actually, the circuit will now generate a minimum duty cycle of around 40%. You may change this resistor to get lower or higher initial speeds.

You need to have in mind also, that, in case you use a 3-wire fan, the feedback from the third wire cannot be used. Instead of the revolution pulses, the third wire will return the PWM pulses. If you want badly to have rpm feedback from a 3-wire fan, you should consider using other circuits:

  • Switching power supply using PWM to control a 3-wire fan with rpm feedback
  • PWM 3-wire fan controller with rpm feedback (pulse stretching method)
  • Simple fan linear rpm controller with a potentiometer and a transistor

  • You can see the adjustments. The 330 resistor to increase the lower duty cycle and the switching FET. Due to the 330 ohm resistor, the lower duty cycle is now around 40% Using 3-wire fans along with this circuit, the feedback from the tacho cannot be useful!



    This is the circuit with the modifications to operate with 2 and 3-wire fans in operation:







    Bill Of Materials (Second circuit)
    Resistors
    R1Resistor 1 KOhm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film 
    R21 KOhm potentiometer
    R3Resistor 1 KOhm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film 
    R4Resistor 330 Ohm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film 
    Capacitors
    C10.1 uF ceramic capacitor
    C21 uF 16 Volts electrolytic capacitor
    Integrated Circuits
    IC1555 Timer 
    Transistors
    Q1IRF520 9.2A, 100V, 0.270 Ohm, N-Channel Power MOSFET 
    Diodes
    D11N4148 Switching Diode 
    D21N4148 Switching Diode 










    Comments

  • At 3 May 2013, 6:13:22 user rawe wrote:   [reply @ rawe]
    • I just tried to use the tacho signal of a 3pin Enermax fan if driven by PWM. All the fans i've tested provide the signal, but its an open collector output.

      Adding a weak (100k) pullup from "tacho" to "12V" makes it possible to get a nice looking tacho signal.


  • At 22 January 2013, 20:14:12 user StoneRhino wrote:   [reply @ StoneRhino]
    • @Giorgos Lazaridis: Your circuit works marvelous! I am running 5 XigmaTek fans when my motherboard absolutely refused to do so. This circuit works so well, that it even controls those pesky Dell OEM fans that only work with dell boards.

      I had found another, that someone else made, but it took 2x more parts. This? It's so simple it blows my mind.

      After 12 attempts to wire various circuits, I managed to not turn the 555N into smoke. Its been so long since I made a scratch circuit.

      On another note, I did not add the Pull-up resistors as was mentioned in one of these comments.

      Thank you for making something so simple that I didnt catch my bench on fire.


  • At 20 January 2013, 2:09:52 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @StoneRhino normally the limit is very high. The circuit has no problem running a whole lot of fans. I do not know though what will happen to the fans and if they produce any sort of flyback reverse current


  • At 18 January 2013, 20:31:22 user StoneRhino wrote:   [reply @ StoneRhino]
    • Out of curiosity, how many fans could just one of these circuits run? The reason I ask is that I've seen a few PWM circuits that cant even run 2 without some sort of amplification of the signal via a switching transistor.


  • At 17 December 2012, 0:47:56 user ChainFire wrote:   [reply @ ChainFire]
    • @Giorgos Lazaridis
      I noticed that the connection is different from http://pcbheaven.com/wikipages/555_Theory/
      . The formula still remain same?


  • At 25 October 2012, 7:31:45 user liam33 wrote:   [reply @ liam33]
    • Thank you very much for this circuit, you saved me a lot of time and effort. It works very well and now sits inside my Samsung digital video recorder!


  • At 18 October 2012, 0:27:16 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @ChainFire R4 is to set a minimum speed.So if you omit R4 as well you will end up with a dead region on the potentiometer. SO use an R4. R3 you can omit it if you use a smaller R2


  • At 17 October 2012, 11:36:32 user ChainFire wrote:   [reply @ ChainFire]
    • Hi, you said that the R3 is to reduce the resistance of R2 is that mean if I omitted the R4; reduce the R2 and R3 to simplify the circuit, the new R2 would be 500 ohm?


  • At 20 September 2012, 12:06:23 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @ChainFire it is the highest rpm of your fan


  • At 20 September 2012, 6:59:59 user ChainFire wrote:   [reply @ ChainFire]
    • Can you tell me the highest rpm of this controller can drive?


  • At 2 August 2012, 9:52:24 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @jean-marc jurkiewicz R3 is to reduce the resistance of R2 because i had no smaller that time.
      As for the output pin, of course you can use it instead. I usually use pin 7 though because it provides an open collector output so i can have whatever (almost) voltage i want. The problem is with the current if you want to drive current loads more than 25-30 mA


  • At 2 August 2012, 5:54:02 user jean-marc jurkiewicz wrote:   [reply @ jean-marc jurkiewicz]
    • Hi ,

      The role of R3 is not clear for me.
      When I try to draw the current sourced or sinked by the "out" of the 555 to the capacitor C1 I have no current going via R3.

      The classical schema for an Astable build around the 555 , where Ra and Rb defining Thigh, Tlow and using the OUT pin to control the fan pin CTR should work fine, as this pinn is (should be) the gate of a MOSFET.

      What do you think ?

      Best regards
      JM


  • At 16 July 2012, 9:51:32 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @Anshul to measure current, you need to connect it in series with the load. Probably you are right. This can might not accept PWM due to the LEDs. It has 3 or 4 wires?


  • At 11 July 2012, 0:39:07 user Anshul wrote:   [reply @ Anshul]
    • @Giorgos Lazaridis
      i used a multimeter to measure the current and voltage, procedure as instructed in its manual(connecting in parallel across the load to measure both voltage and current).
      i changed the capactor C1 to 0.05uF no improvements :(
      also wanted to tell you that I ran three 80mm 12v 0.32amp on the circuit connected in parallel successfully.

      I think this(link: http://www.coolermaster.in/product.php?product_id=6037) fan has some internal circuitry which is not allowing it to run on a pwm voltage somehow.
      thanks anyways.


  • At 10 July 2012, 2:14:25 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @Anshul hmmm it is a very common fan... how the leds of the fan are powered? Do they have different supply cable? Maybe they cause some sort of interference, although i doubt...
      You may also use a smaller capacitor for C1 to remove the noise (acoustic spectrum PWM). You can for test connect two 0.1uF capacitors in series to have a 0.05uF capacitor, just for the test.
      One question: How did you measure the maximum current? You did not put the ammeter in series with the mosfet, did you????


  • At 10 July 2012, 1:43:44 user Anshul wrote:   [reply @ Anshul]
    • @Giorgos Lazaridis Im making a fan controller for my pc so the psu supplies 12v 24W on the rail, im using.

      The fan having issue:
      fan specs: 12v, 0.35amp, long life sleeve bearing
      link: http://www.coolermaster.in/product.php?product_id=6037
      The fan which ran successfully:
      fan specs: 12v, 0.16amp, sleeve bearing
      link:http://www.coolermaster.in/product.php?product_id=95
      also, I checked the maximum output voltage and current of the circuit to the fans with a multimeter
      voltage: 10.8-11v, current: 2.32amp
      so the power is not a trouble at all its much more than sufficient.
      so what the hell could be wrong with this circuit(2) :(
      please suggest !


  • At 8 July 2012, 12:50:20 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @Anshul what type of fan do you use? What is your power supply? What type i mean and how much volt/current can it provide.
      Yes you can ground the pin 5 via a 10nF capacitor


  • At 8 July 2012, 5:46:09 user Anshul wrote:   [reply @ Anshul]
    • Sir your circuit design is so far the best on the web

      I had following questions regarding 3 pin fan controller:

      1. Can I ground CNTR pin of IC555 with a capacitor? If yes what type and rating.
      2. I'm having trouble running a 12v 4.32watt fan (it wont spin at all and produce a noise) whereas the circuit has been tested fine with a 2watt fan. can you suggest whats wrong and any solution for this problem.
      (my guess is low current through MOS, comment please)

      Thanks in advance


  • At 21 June 2012, 12:13:58 user kenneth wrote:   [reply @ kenneth]
    • ive did all this, to wire it to a 3wire fan , but no luck , the fan wont turn..


  • At 17 June 2012, 6:49:51 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @kenneth C1 is ceramic so usually it is 50V, but does not really matter when you place your order.


  • At 17 June 2012, 0:42:26 user kenneth wrote:   [reply @ kenneth]
    • Hello Kammenos,

      I am very excited to build my first controller .
      i am searching for the components but neither i don't find those correctly back in the shops.

      R1 Resistor 1 KOhm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film
      R3 Resistor 1 KOhm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film
      R4 Resistor 330 Ohm 1/4 Watt 5% Carbon Film

      Capacitors
      C1 0.1 uF ceramic capacitor <- is this 16 volts too?

      C2 1 uF 16 Volts electrolytic capacitor

      Best regards
      kenneth


  • At 12 June 2012, 22:12:42 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @Erwin Christianto that will be a 3-phace brushless sensorless motor. You need some sort of driver to make, but fortunately there are integrated circuits to do just that. you only hook up the wires of the motor to the chip


  • At 12 June 2012, 20:43:54 user Erwin Christianto wrote:   [reply @ Erwin Christianto]
    • Hello PCBHeaven,
      Nice to watch your video.
      I want to run a brushless motor from a damage hard disk.
      Can U help me.
      Thank You Very Much.


  • At 13 March 2012, 13:44:52 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @greg yep, sort of. the frequency will be theoretically fixed, since this circuit changes only the duty cycle and not the frequency.


  • At 13 March 2012, 5:51:47 user greg wrote:   [reply @ greg]
    • @Giorgos Lazaridis So I only need to set the proper C1 value in use with the pot the be able to sweep the frequency from 30Khz to 50Khz. Is that correct? Like 1pF cap and a 10K ohm resistor. Calculated here:

      http://www.csgnetwork.com/ne555timer2calc.html


  • At 12 March 2012, 23:25:58 user Giorgos Lazaridis wrote:   [reply @ Giorgos Lazaridis]
    • @greg yes you can. the 555 stands higher frequencies


  • At 12 March 2012, 18:57:27 user greg wrote:   [reply @ greg]
    • I want to know if I could use this to provide up to 50 Khz PWM signal? Would that just burn up the timer?


  • At 2 January 2012, 2:31:51 user jjety wrote:   [reply @ jjety]
    • how to calculate the T_high and T_low on the second circuit?


  • At 1 January 2012, 14:40:10 user jjety wrote:   [reply @ jjety]
    • can you please give the calculation of the second circuit?


  • At 11 December 2011, 21:55:58 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @Mark Main 21KHz is the frequency for the PWM pulses. The other frequencies are for the fan speed (yellow wire). You can ground pin 5 through a 10pf capacitor if you want, not directly.
      For more info on 555 read my theory
      http://pcbheaven.com/wikipages/555_Theory


  • At 11 December 2011, 18:48:20 user Mark Main wrote:   [reply @ Mark Main]
    • You wrote that the frequency \"will never fall bellow 21KHz thus you will not hear a thing\" and later cite \"17 Hz (510 rpm) is the minimum rpm predefined by the manufacturer\" and \"64 Hz (1920 rpm) is the maximum RPM\" in the pictures. I\'m confused by this point.

      Also, would it be ok to Ground pin 5 on this design?

      How do we calculate what the frequency will be? Thanks for a nice job on this by the way.


  • At 5 November 2011, 8:27:08 user milkshakes wrote:   [reply @ milkshakes]
    • OK,so i finally got round to this.i re-did the circuit,and it was a wiring fault.it works great now.
      thanks.


  • At 21 October 2011, 22:41:12 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @milkshakes the 555 should not overheat, not even get hot. There is a problem in the connection, or the fan you use sinks lot of current in the 4th pin. Increase R1 to 1.5K and put an additional resistor between pin 7 and r1, about 150 to 220 ohms. If still overheats you have bad connection somewhere


  • At 21 October 2011, 8:07:04 user milkshakes wrote:   [reply @ milkshakes]
    • ok,so i made the circuit.it controls the fans speed (i tested it with 4 fans) but i noticed that the 555 timer gets very hot.do i need a different 555 or should i put a heat-sink on it?
      thanks.


  • At 30 September 2011, 22:40:53 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @jon you can directly connect R1 to 5v instead of 12, but i do not think that this is the case. All the fans i've used work pretty fine.


  • At 29 September 2011, 18:57:13 user jon wrote:   [reply @ jon]
    • I don't have the oscilloscope to monitor the frequency but pretty much sure that it works coz the voltage varies and base on the online calculator will achieve the required frequency. thanks


  • At 29 September 2011, 18:47:28 user jon wrote:   [reply @ jon]
    • I'm using a 4 wires TM-CF06 cpu fan, substitute for LGA CPU Cooler. the same color code in http://pcbheaven.com/wikipages/How_PC_Fans_Work/
      (black, red, yellow, blue
      thanks for the help


  • At 29 September 2011, 7:36:41 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @jon what fan you use?


  • At 28 September 2011, 21:39:02 user jon wrote:   [reply @ jon]
    • hi,
      i followed your 1st circuit but couldn\'t control the speed. I also learned from your link (4 wire pwm spec) that the max voltage capacity pwm output signal is 5.25v. pin 7 exceeded to its max voltage requirement. did I destroyed my fan\'s control input? it is still function directly using ground and 12v.


  • At 24 September 2011, 11:20:45 user cuelebre wrote:   [reply @ cuelebre]
    • Ok!

      I have all the components and I'm going to try it :)

      Thank you very much for your help and inspiration.

      Regards.


  • At 24 September 2011, 10:46:02 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @cuelebre oh, i see. No you cannot do it that simple. For this reason, i have design this:
      http://pcbheaven.com/circuitpages/Voltage_Controlled_PWM_Generator

      You will replace the 1.5K resistor from the dc voltage input with your thermistor.


  • At 24 September 2011, 4:54:15 user cuelebre wrote:   [reply @ cuelebre]
    • Hello, it helps :)

      But i want to do a pwm temperature regulator for 4-pin fans :)

      Can i change R3 by a NTC termistor?

      Thanks for your help.


  • At 24 September 2011, 0:37:57 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @cuelebre maybe this helps:
      http://pcbheaven.com/circuitpages/Two_Speed_Temperature_Fan_Controller


  • At 22 September 2011, 16:21:36 user cuelebre wrote:   [reply @ cuelebre]
    • Hello.

      How can I adapt this circuit in order that it works automatically depending on the temperature?

      It is to control the temperature of a few aluminium coolers.

      Thank you.


  • At 3 September 2011, 11:19:13 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @p00chie i suppose that you use circuit #2, with the IRF520. The IRF has a 0.3ohms resistance, so to have a 1.3 volts drop, the motors have to draw 4.3 amperes (2.1 ampere each motor). If this is the case, then you can do nothing else than to increase the supply voltage up to 13.3 volts.

      If your motors do not draw that much current, then i suppose that the circuit never reaches 100% duty cycle. There is one simple test to do: remove the wire from pin7 of the 555. What happens? You should hear the fans run at full speed. Is this correct?


  • At 31 August 2011, 21:43:50 user p00chie wrote:   [reply @ p00chie]
    • I\'m using this circuit to control 2 fans. Works great, however, I\'ve noticed the fans do not run at full speed... they go I bit faster when connected to the 12vdc power supply bypassing the circuit. I measured the output to the fans when using the circuit at max speed and I get 10.7/.8 volts.. is there a way I can avoid that 1.3 drop?


  • At 29 August 2011, 7:18:33 user milkshakes wrote:   [reply @ milkshakes]
    • thanks,you have been very helpful!


  • At 28 August 2011, 23:27:29 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @milkshakes 8 fans will not be a problem. You have to make a small change though. You have to add a pull-up resistor for each fan PWM control wire (usually it is blue). In the schematic i have only one pull-up, that will be R1 (1K). But you have to use one pull-up for each separate fan. This resistor must be 4.7K and not 1K (as i have now).


  • At 28 August 2011, 12:34:49 user milkshakes wrote:   [reply @ milkshakes]
    • * i meant maximum current


  • At 28 August 2011, 12:33:16 user milkshakes wrote:   [reply @ milkshakes]
    • the fans that i want to use are the 4 wire type.
      how do i find the minimum current,do i have to rip the fan to pieces or is there a safer way (for the fan) to find it?
      i want to control between 4 and 8 coolermater xtraflow fans.
      i havent decided on a 555 yet,havent even had a look,could you give me a max current that one can output?


  • At 27 August 2011, 9:57:19 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @milkshakes for 4-wire fans, i cannot answer, because i have to know the minimum current required for each fan for the PWM input, as well as the maximum current the 555 can sink through the discharrge pin (7).
      For 3-wire fans, it can control as much as the Q1 can handle. I use a 9A mosfet. Average, a PC fan draws some 400mA, so i could run 20-22 fans.


  • At 27 August 2011, 9:35:07 user milkshakes wrote:   [reply @ milkshakes]
    • what is the maximum amount of fans this controller can control simultaneously?
      thanks.


  • At 1 June 2011, 22:14:24 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @khai R3 is to adjust the value of R2. You can omit it but then you will fave even less frequency. To increase your frequency, slightly decrease R3.


  • At 1 June 2011, 13:14:46 user khai wrote:   [reply @ khai]
    • What is the function of the R3 in both version? Can it omitted from the circuit?

      I can\'t get the 25 KHz PWM freq. from the R2(Rpot), R3 and C1\'s value given only ~18 KHz

      Does this formula correct?
      Fpwm = 1.49/( (R2||R3) * C1) )


  • At 2 April 2011, 1:52:15 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • @Jerrywaz yes it can, but a triac will not operate normally as you expect. if you want to make a dimmer for AC circuit, better see my other circuits that i have an AC dimmer. Triacs are meant to work mainly with AC


  • At 1 April 2011, 7:40:27 user Jerrywaz wrote:   [reply @ Jerrywaz]
    • Can this circuit be used to drive a triac?


  • At 12 February 2011, 3:01:47 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • R4, R3 and C2. C2 must become 0.1 uF. regarding R4 and R4, you need to test.


  • At 12 February 2011, 2:49:06 user Hoosh777 wrote:   [reply @ Hoosh777]
    • What would I have to change if I replaced the pot with a 10K ohm? That is the smallest one I can find locally.


  • At 5 February 2011, 2:40:42 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • You can go as high as you like, but the higher you go, the less rpm band control you have. It is up to you. Of course, you need to go high enough for the fan not to stall! This is important. Regarding the capacitor, you can add the small capacitor as well with no problem. It will filter higher frequency. And yes, it is good for the power supply of the PC. But the power supply (and everything that is connected to it) has its own filters, so this is not absolutely necessary.


  • At 2 February 2011, 23:24:48 user Hoosh777 wrote:   [reply @ Hoosh777]
    • I'm using the second circuit to control a 120mm, 2-wire, ball bearing, brushless fan in my computer.
      When I turn the pot all the way down, and then stop the fan with my fingers, it doesn't start back up, even if I change R4 to 2500 Ohms. Is it ok to go higher? Is there a limit, or should I change something else?

      Also, I read that it is good to put a 0.1uF poly metal or ceramic capacitor parallel to C2 (supply to the 555). Is that ok to do?

      Am I right that C2 (and the 0.1uF ceramic - if I add it) relieve the stress on my computers' power supply when the 555 is changing from HIGH to LOW?


  • At 29 January 2011, 13:18:59 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • Rainer, you do not increase or decrease the resistance. What you need to do is test first before you wire permanently.


  • At 29 January 2011, 9:39:23 user Rainer wrote:   [reply @ Rainer]
    • Hi,

      As far as I understood the circuit R2 is used for changing the Fan speed.

      Question: If I increase the resistance what does the fan do ? Increase or decrease the speed ? I would like to know it so I can wire the Potentiometer in that way that by turning CW the fan speed increases and CCW the fan speed decreases.

      Thanks


  • At 19 January 2011, 15:07:19 user guybrush wrote:   [reply @ guybrush]
    • I built the first circuit and killed a fan with it. PWM fans are rated with a max of 5.25 volts on the control line, so 11.6 volts at 100% dutycycle kills the internals of the fan.
      Also it didn´t worked for 4 of the 9 fans i´ve tested.
      And I´ll get some really annoying high pitch noise...


  • At 12 October 2010, 2:57:16 user Kammenos wrote:   [reply @ Kammenos]
    • If you read the 2 last paragraphs you will see why. The lower duty cycle is about 40%, so to prevent the fan from stalling. Read the paragraphs and you will see how you can change this value to almost 0.


  • At 11 October 2010, 15:55:35 user herctrap wrote:   [reply @ herctrap]
    • or is it better to use some irzn44n that i have

      maybe 2 or 3 in parallel?

      thanks a lot


  • At 11 October 2010, 15:50:48 user herctrap wrote:   [reply @ herctrap]
    • I want something like that to controll some bigger fans


      so i am thinking to send the output to the base of a high power NPN such as a Tip35c ( maybe i wiil need a tip41c in the middle )

      and then controll the GND of the fan with the pwm

      but when i test it with a led i dont think that i have from 0% to 100% dutycycle

      thanks a lot


     

      Name

      Email (shall not be published)

      Website

    Notify me of new posts via email


    Write your comments below:

          





    delicious
    digg
    reddit this Reddit this
    Faves



     HOT in heaven!

    Find us on Facebook


    NEW in heaven!



    New Circuit: Bistable relay



     Contact     Forum     Projects     Experiments     Circuits     Theory     BLOG     PIC Tutorials     Time for Science     RSS   

    Site design: Giorgos Lazaridis
    © Copyright 2008
    Please read the Terms of services and the Privacy policy